Table of Contents: Issue 3

Edward W. Said. On Late Style. London: Bloomsbury, 2006. 176 pp.

Read online | Download as PDF

"Prisoner's Dilemma" vs. William S. Burroughs's "Controller's Dilemma": A Discursive Motif in the Repression of Working-Class Self-Organization

In 1966 Noam Chomsky published Cartesian Linguistics, which surveyed the origins of modern linguistics, and Jacques Derrida a year after furnished a commentary on the book (The Linguistic Circle of Geneva). Using these two interrelated texts as a point of departure, we look at the origin of the crisis of the Keynesian capitalism through the shifting uses of the "prisoner's dilemma", a postwar capitalist parable of chance and control, from its original conception at the start of the Cold War to its post-Keynesian reformulation in Garret Hardin's "The Tragedy of the Commons". The ideologically loaded assumptions of "prisoner's dilemma" stand in stark contrast to William S. Burroughs's "controllers' dilemma", which demystifies capitalist power of control for the neoliberal era. However, it is necessary to recognize that even the "controllers' dilemma", aimed to critically grasp the corporate-media-driven mechanisms of population control, does not adequately grasp the power of revolutionary chance embodied in spontaneous working-class collectivities, such as the workers' council and the commons. Just as Derrida proposed to rethink the rationalist origin of modern linguistics through Rousseau, we must do the same in relation to the history of working-class self-organizations and the assumptions underlying their formation.

Read online | Download as PDF

Happiness Filled the Space of Sadness: the Weight, Tragedy and Paradox of Milan Kundera's Freedom

This paper examines Milan Kundera's interest in Nietzsche's idea of eternal recurrence in the novel The Unbearable Lightness of Being (1984). Using both Nietzsche and Freud, primarily On the Genealogy of Morality (1887) and Civilization and its Discontents (1930) as critical references, it discusses the thematic and narrative revaluations of and challenges to traditional morality and literature. Kundera’s basic question is whether our lives will have weight or lightness; specifically, he asks us to consider Nietzsche’s difficult challenge that we will each moment in our lives to recur eternally. The paper wishes to show how such a thought experiment allows for a paradoxical existential freedom in repetition, as opposed to a weightless, linear life where an event occurring once might well not occur at all. I will discuss how this revaluation of values is situated in a philosophical tradition leading to Nietzsche and Freud. Moreover I will discuss how Kundera dramatizes his philosophical concerns through both the novel's content, mostly with his characters Tomas and Tereza, as well as the non-linear form of the novel.

Read online | Download as PDF

I Wrote Eugene Onegin: Voices of Subversion and Submission in Soviet Anecdotes

Soviet anecdotes may appear to be simple jokes, but they were taken seriously enough by the Soviet government to be made illegal; retelling them could be punishable by heavy sentencing. They form a rich and vibrant discursive body, and one that has largely evaded critical attention. This paper explores the content of the jokes, and what it reveals about levels of awareness among the soviet people and the infiltration of propaganda. Yet more crucially it aims to investigate what these anecdotes reveal about power relationships in more general terms, not just the content of the jokes but the very act of joke telling. In simple terms the anecdotes demonstrate a resistance, as they shift the ability to generate discourse, and hence knowledge and power into the hands of the masses. Yet the anecdotes are deeply ambiguous, for there also appears to be an inherent passivity: to mock one's surroundings, and create a tradition and almost an identity based on such mockery, also tends to suggest a tacit acknowledgment that one accepts the status quo.

Read online | Download as PDF

William Blake and the Bible: Reading and Writing the Law

William Blake held an ambiguous view of the Bible, believing it to be at once revelatory in its prophetic or visionary mode and yet oppressive in its espousal of the Moral Law. By imitating the principle of parallelism, which is to be found in Hebraic verse, Blake's poetry offers a radical aesthetic which subverts the notion that the Bible, as the embodiment of the Law, is a semantically stable and formally unified text. He believed that the Bible, despite being the Law, is not subject to the classical and neo-classical laws or conventions of reading and writing which promote a single, authoritative voice or textual presence and which promote form over content. Blake's poetry is multivalent and foregrounds the semantic as opposed to the formal unity of the text, subsequently challenging notions of reading and writing as creative acts bound by formal and institutional laws and conventions.

Read online | Download as PDF

Butterfly and Bulkhead: Chance, Control, Conrad

Read online | Download as PDF